top of page

Precision Feeding: Nutritional Grouping of Cattle

alternative practice names:

Nutritional grouping of cattle involves dividing cows into groups based on factors such as physiological stage (fresh, lactating, or dry), age (first-calf heifers or mature animals), or production status (high-, mid-, or late-lactation). This approach enables farmers to create specific diets that closely match the nutritional needs of each group. For example, cows near peak lactation require more dry matter due to higher nutrient demands compared to those in later lactation. Nutritional grouping allows for more precise feeding, improving herd management and overall nutritional efficiency.

When used, in what regions in the U.S. is the practice found: 

Northwest, West, Upper Midwest, Southwest, Northeast, Southeast

FARM SIZE 

When used, typically found on farms of the following sizes:

Over 500 cows

Case Studies.png

Practice Benefits 

Avoiding over- or under-feeding: This approach reduces the risks of overfeeding or underfeeding, which can occur when all cows are fed the same diet. Grouping cows by lactation stage or production level allows for more precise feeding, optimizing nutrient intake, improving milk yield, and enhancing overall health.


Improved production efficiency: Improvements in animal diet will lead to improved animal health and production efficiency. For example, studies have suggested that splitting lactating cattle into early to peak lactation and mid to late lactation improves milk production relative to group diet feeding.

Practical Insights.png

Implementation Insights

Site-specific or Farm-specific requirements 

farm-icon.png
  • Loose housing: Improvements in nutritional grouping and stocking density can be performed throughout the U.S. but are typically discussed on farms with loose housing systems (e.g., free stalls or dry lots). 

Required Capital Expenditures (CapEx)

red-dollar-0.png
  • Infrastructure upgrades: Implementing nutritional grouping often requires modifying barns by adding pens, adjusting feeding systems, or dividing spaces to accommodate different cow groups. Farmers may need to invest in equipment like stall loops, headrails, or headlocks and ensure adequate water access to meet the needs of newly formed groups. This can involve significant upfront costs.

  • Technology investments: Nutritional grouping may necessitate the purchase of advanced feeding systems, monitoring tools, and management software to accurately track and manage the nutritional needs of different cow groups.

  • Training and setup: Initial costs may include training staff on new feeding protocols and nutritional management practices and any costs associated with establishing new systems or procedures.

Required Operational Expenditures (OpEx)

orange-dollar-0.png
  • Increased labor costs: Nutritional grouping requires more detailed management and monitoring, which can increase labor requirements. Staff may need to spend additional time on feeding management, monitoring cow health, and adjusting groups as needed. Feeders will need to mix more diets than previously needed. Additionally, farm personnel may need to increase the time and effort to fetch and milk cattle split across more pens and in a higher number of pens.

  • Feed management: Although nutritional grouping aims to optimize feed usage, the ongoing costs of managing multiple feed types and ensuring the precise allocation to each group can increase operational complexity and costs.

  • Maintenance and upkeep: Ongoing costs include maintaining new infrastructure, feeding systems, and technology to support nutritional grouping. Regular updates to software and equipment may also be necessary to maintain efficiency.

Implementation Considerations

implementation-complexity-1.png
  • Complex implementation: Nutritional grouping requires careful planning and continuous monitoring, which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive for farm managers.

  • Social stress among cows: Moving cows between groups can disrupt social hierarchies, causing stress that may negatively impact their health and milk production.

  • Economic considerations: While nutritional grouping can lead to cost savings in the long run, the initial setup costs, including infrastructure changes and management adjustments, can be significant.

  • Inconsistent results: The benefits of nutritional grouping can vary depending on farm-specific factors such as herd size, facilities, and management practices, leading to unpredictable outcomes.

  • Difficulty with grouping accuracy: Accurately categorizing cows based on their nutritional needs can be challenging. This can lead to the potential for overfeeding or underfeeding certain groups.

Financial Considerations and Revenue Streams

There are no federal cost-share programs or conservation funding for this practice.


PROFIT POTENTIAL

Grouping dairy cows based on factors like lactation stage and nutritional needs can optimize feed efficiency, improve milk production, and reduce health issues, leading to a better return on investment (ROI). By managing cows in tailored groups, farmers can lower feed costs while maximizing productivity and overall herd health, improving profitability in the long term.

Research Results.png

Environmental Impacts

MAY REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS FOOTPRINT

Little scientific research directly evaluates the practice's impact on a farm's greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint. However, by grouping cows according to their specific nutrient requirements, farms can feed nutrients more precisely, which leads to better nutrient allocation and reduces waste. This practice not only enhances milk production but also decreases the environmental impact by reducing the excretion of excess nutrients such as nitrogen. In addition, targeting the nutrient requirements of animals through grouping can improve feed nutrient utilization and reduce enteric GHG emissions. Thus, decreasing feed input per unit of product can be another tool to decrease methane intensity, particularly in less-efficient animals. 

farm-assessment.png

Alignment with FARM Program

FARM Environmental Stewardship (ES) V2-V3 Alignment

FARM ES uses information about rations to calculate GHG emissions intensity, including enteric methane. The platform focuses on the lactating herd ration, with the option to enter details on rations for other animal classes. FARM ES Version 3 has the ability to run custom 'what-if' scenarios where users can change various inputs, including ration information, to determine the impact on farm emissions.

Contents

farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png
farm-icon.png

We're always eager to update the website with the latest research, implementation insights, financial case studies, and emerging practices. Use the link above to share your insights. 

We're always eager to update the website with the latest research, implementation insights, financial case studies, and emerging practices. Use the link above to share your insights. 

Contents

farm-icon.png

Practice Overview

Case Studies.png
Practical Insights.png
dollar.png
reference,png
Research Results.png
farm-assessment.png

Nutritional grouping of cattle involves dividing cows into groups based on factors such as physiological stage (fresh, lactating, or dry), age (first-calf heifers or mature animals), or production status (high-, mid-, or late-lactation). This approach enables farmers to create specific diets that closely match the nutritional needs of each group. For example, cows near peak lactation require more dry matter due to higher nutrient demands compared to those in later lactation. Nutritional grouping allows for more precise feeding, improving herd management and overall nutritional efficiency.

Practices and technologies

Precision Feeding: Nutritional Grouping of Cattle

alternative practice name: